Gender and Technoscience: A Historical Perspective

Pnina Geraldine Abir-Am

Abstract


This paper explores turning points in the historical relationship between gender and technoscience, most notably the gender parity of the 2009 Nobel Prizes; the public debate on the under-representation of women in science that raged world-wide but especially in the US during 2005-2006; and the construction of a public memory for a leading woman technoscientist in the mid-1990s. The paper situates these turning points in the context of historical events, most notably the Scientific Revolution of the 17th Century, WW2 and the Cold War, the women’s liberation movement of the 1970s that legally ended overt gender discrimination, and the rise of covert gender discrimination since the 1990s. The paper concludes by drawing attention to recent findings on new technoscientific environments, most notably biotech start ups, as innovative settings that offer flexibility, and hence a more viable route to gender parity.

Keywords


covert discrimination; gender; history; parity; power relations; public memory; technoscience; women scientists.

Full Text:

PDF [en]

References


ABIR-AM, P.G. (2010). What´s in a session. History of Science Society Newsletter, 35(1) January, 24-25.

----------- (1996). Women in Modern Scientific Research: A Historical Overview. World Science Report. UNESCO, Paris, 348-59. (also in French, Spanish, Chinese)

----------- (1992). Science policy or social policy for women in science: Lessons from historical case studies. Science and Public Policy, 19 (4) April, 11-12.

ABIR-AM, P. G., Outram, D. (Eds.), (1987, 1989). Une asy Careers and Intimate Lives, Women in Science, 1789-1979. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick/NJ.

ADVANCE (2005). NSF Program, Discussion on May 19&20. (www.advance-portal.net)

BAILYN, L. (1993). Breaking the Mold: Women, Men, and Time in the New Corporate World. The Free Press, New York.

BIX, A.S. (2004). A History of Women´s U.S. Engineering Education, NWSA Journal, 16(1) 27-49.

BRAY, F. (2007). Gender and Technology, Annual Review of Anthropology, 36, 37-53.

CORNELIUSSEN, H.G. (2009). Disrupting the Impression of Stability in the Gender-Technology Relation, 5 th European Symposium on Gender & ICT, March 2009, University of Bremen, Germany.

COWAN, R.S. (1983). More Work for Mother: The Ironies of Household Technology from the Open Hearth to the Microwave. Basic Books, New York.

DEAN, C. (2005). Theorist Drawn into Debate ´That Will Not Go Away ?´, The New York Times, 04-12-2005.

ETZKOWITZ, H., Gupta, N. (2006). Women in Science: A Fair Share? Minerva, 44, 185-199.

ETZKOWITZ, H. et.al. (2000). Athena Unbound : The Advancement of Women in Science and Technolog y. Cambridge University Press, New York.

FISCHER, I.K. (2005). Geodesy? What´s That? I Universe, Inc., New York.

FOX, M.F. Johnson, D.G., Rosser, S.V. (eds.) (2006). Women, Gender, and Technology. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Illinois.

FOX KELLER, E. (1985). Reflections on Gender and Science. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.

FRIEDMAN, R.M. (2001) The Politics of Excellence. Behind the Nobel Prize in Science. Henry Holt and Company, LLC, New York.

GREEN, A., Troup, K. (1999). The Houses of History. A Critical Reader in 20 th Century History and Theory. New York University Press, New York.

GRINT K., Gill, R. (eds.) (1995). The Gender-Technology Relation: Contemporary Theory and Research. Taylor & Francis, London.

HARAWAY, D.J. (1989) Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science. Routledge, New York and London.

------ (1997) Feminism and Technoscience. Routledge, New York and London.

--- - -- (2004). The Haraway Reader. Routledge, New York and London.

HOWES, R.H., Herzenberg, C.L. (1999). Their Day in the Sun: Women of the Manhattan Project. Temple University Press, Philadelphia.

KELLER, E. (1985). Reflections on Gender and Science. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.

KOHLSTEDT, S.G., H. Longino (eds.) (1997). Women, Gender and Science, New Directions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. (also as Osiris 12)

LERMAN, N.E, et al, (eds.) (2003). Gender and Technology: A Reader. Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, Baltimore.

LEURS, K. (2009). Performing gender and etrhnicity in socio-cultural networks: entangling feminist technoscience and post-colonial theory. feministtechnoscience.se/journal. [Accessed March 22, 2010]

M ERCHANT, C. (1980). The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology, and the Scientific Revolution. Harper and Row, New York.

MCGRAYNE, S.B. (1998). Nobel Prize Women in Science. Their Lives, Struggles and Momentous Discoveries. Citadel Press, Secaucus/ N.J. 2 nd edition.

NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCE (2006, 2009). Beyond Bias and Barriers. NAS Press, Washington, D.C: free executive summary at http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11741.html) [Accessed October 4, 2006]

NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH (2005). Diversifying the Science & Engineering Workforce, 2 volumes. (Proceedings of a Conference, 1/14-15, 2005; Cambridge, MA)

NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL (1991). Women in Science and Engineering: Increasing their numbers in the 1990s. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION CONFERENCE REPORT (1997). Women & Science: Celebrating Achievements, Charting Challenges. National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA.

OUDSHOORN, N, (2003). The Male Pill, A Biography of a Technology in the Making. Duke University Press, Durham, N.C.

OUDSHOORN, N., et a. l (2004). " Configuring the user as everybody: gender and design cultures in information and communication technologies. Science, Technology and Human Values, 29(1) 30-63.

PYCIOR, H.M., Slack N.G., Abir-Am, P.G. (eds.) (1996). Creative Couples in the Sciences. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick/N.J.

RAYMAN, P., et al. (eds.) (2008). Working WISE: Intergenerations Voices Advancing Research and Policy for Women in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Univ. of Mass. Lowell Center for Women and Work, Lowell, MA.

ROTHSCHILD, J. (ed.) (1983). Machina ex dea: Feminist Perspectives on Technology. Pergamon Press, New York.

ROSSER, S, V. (2004). The Science Glass Ceiling: Academic Women Scientists and the Struggle to Succeed. Routledge, New York.

ROSSITER, M. W. (1982) Women Scientists in America, Struglles and Strategies, 1880-1940 Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

------ (1995). Bef ore Affirmative Action, Women Scientists in America, 1940-1972. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

SCHIEBINGER, L. (1989). The Mind Has No Sex? Women in the Origins of Modern Science. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

SMITH-DOERR, L. (2006). Women´s Work, Gender Equality vs. Hierarchy in the Life Sciences. Rinner, Boulder/CO.

STANLEY, A. (1993). Mothers and Daughters of Invention: Notes for a Revised History of Technology. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ.

VALIAN, V. (1999). Why So Slow: The Advancement of Women. The M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, MA.

WAJCMAN, J. (2007). "From Women and Technology to Gendered Technoscience", Information, Communication, and Society, 10(3) 287-298.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242010000100012



Copyright (c)



2017 © Universidad Alberto Hurtado - Facultad de Economía y Negocios. 
Erasmo Escala 1835 - Santiago, Chile.
Economic Analysis Review | Observatorio Económico | Gestión y Tendencias 

Journal Supported by Chimera Innova Group