El Proceso de Desarrollo de Productos Tecnológicos entre las Universidades y las Mipymes Mexicanas: una Carrera de Obstáculos

Luis Roberto Vega-González

Abstract


Today firm’s competitiveness depends on the development of proprietary technology and its integration to commercial technological products. Experiences and case studies show that the micro, small and medium firms (MIPYMES, in Spanish) develop technological products collaborating with public universities. In this work it is presented the colaborative technological product development process phases focusing in the identification of the diverse obstacles occurring along the process. Diverse technical, organizational and communication aspects that affects the project development are discussed. The resistances or barriers to the development make it difficult and could cause project abandon sometimes. This empirical and exploratory research is conducted under the reference of the technological project management model developed and used at the Centro de Ciencias Aplicadas y Desarrollo Tecnológico (CCADET) of the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM).

Keywords


technological development barriers; resistance; technological products; Small & Medium enterprises.

Full Text:

PDF [es]

References


BIOTECHNOLOGY IRELAND (2009). Commercializing Biotech, Enterprise Ireland. Disponible en http://www.biotechnologyireland.com/bfora/systems/xmlviewer/default.asp?arg=DS_BIR_NOTEART_1_list.xsl/2 [ Consultado el 3 de agosto de 2009].

CRUZ, R., Martínez, C. (2009). Tema 8: Estrategias competitivas dinámicas ; Dirección Comercial II, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, disponible en http://www.uam.es/personal_pdi/economicas/javierg/docencia/Derecho/Tema%208.doc [Consultado el 30 de abril de 2009].

DIARIO OFICIAL DE LA FEDERACIÓN (2008). Acuerdo por el que se establecen las Reglas de Operación para el otorgamiento de Apoyos del Fondo de Apoyo para la Micro, Pequeña y Mediana Empresa (Fondo PyME). 15° Sección; Secretaría de Economía, 29 de diciembre.

FRANZONI, Ch. (2007). Opportunity recognition in technology transfer organizations: five case studies from UK and Italy. International Entrepreneur Management Journal. Vol 3, pp. 51-67

HUGHES D., Chafin D. (1996). Product Development Continuous Learning Process, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 13, pp. 89-104. Elsevier Science Ltd., New York, USA.

JING Z. J., Zhou, Y. T. (2008). Knowledge integration based technology transfer mode for manufacturing firms, IEEE Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC), pp.4480-4886.

KHALIL, T., Ezzat, H. (2005). Management of Technology and responsive policies in new economy, International Journal of Technology Management (IJTM), Vol. 32 Nos. 1/2; pp. 88-111.

KONDO, M. (2005). Networking for technology Acquisition and transfer. International Journal for Technology Management, Vol. 32, No´s ½.

MOSTERT J. N., Buys A. J. (2008). The Practice of Technology Transfer, PICMET Proceedings, Cape Town, South Africa, pp. 27-31.

VERA R., Gerd P., Reigota M. (2007). The second reality: typical problems of Nothern technology transfer experts in the environmental sector in Brazil, Newsletter of the Research Committee 23 Sociology of Science and Technology ; International Sociological Association; Issue 5, November; pp. 5-8.

VILLANUEVA Monzón M. (2009). Barreras culturales a la innovación en las pequeñas empresas manufactureras, Fundación Robotike r, Unidad Tecnológica de Madrid, Disponible en: http://www.madrimasd.org/revista/revista10 /tribuna/tribunas1.asp [Consultado 13 abril 2009].




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242009000400010



Copyright (c)



2017 © Universidad Alberto Hurtado - Facultad de Economía y Negocios. 
Erasmo Escala 1835 - Santiago, Chile.
Economic Analysis Review | Observatorio Económico | Gestión y Tendencias 

Journal Supported by Chimera Innova Group