R&D Management and the Stokes Diagram: An Exploratory Study

Willy Hoppe Sousa, Mery Piedad Zamudio Igami, Diogenes de Souza Bido

Abstract


The Stokes Diagram model was developed to replace the linear mode view of a progression of science by a two dimensional plane in which the vertical dimension represents the search of understanding and the horizontal dimension represents the use. Although this diagram is easy to understand, no cases of organizations or government programs were identified in literature which developed a method to put this proposal in practice. Thus, based on the development of a conceptual and operating model, both dimensions were measured and validated through structural equation modeling, using information from 28 dissertations developed in a Postgraduate program. The results suggest that the proposed method is viable and give some examples of its use to analyze and manage R&D activities.

Keywords


Pasteur´s quadrant; Stokes diagram; R& D management; knowledge management.

Full Text:

PDF [en]

References


AMAVARADI, C, S., Lee, I. (2005). The dimensions of process knowledge, Knowledge and Process Management, 12, pp. 65-76.

BALARAM, P. (2008), Science, invention and Pasteur´s quadrant, Current Science, 94, pp. 961-962. http://www.ias.ac.in/currsci/ apr252008/961.pdf [Retrieved from the Web 22 May 2008]

BIGWOOD, M. P., (2004), Managing the new technology exploitation process. Research Technology Management, 47, pp. 38-42.

BRITO Cruz, C. H., (2008), Políticas para C&T&I para o Brasil. http://www.ifi.unicamp.br/~brito [Retrieved from the Web 13 Jun 2008]

CAMARA, G. (2005) Um Instituto, Três Missões, Dez Compromissos. http://www.dpi.inpe.br/gilberto/inpe/ apresentacao_ comite_busca.ppt [ Retrieved from the Web 20 Apr 2008]

CHIN, W. W. (1998). The Partial Least Squares approach to structural equation modeling, in: Marcoulides, G. A. (Ed.), Modern Methods for Business Research. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., USA.

DAVENPORT, T.H., Jarvenpaa, S. L., Beers, M. (1996). Improving knowledge work, Sloan Management Review, 34, pp. 53-65.

GIBBONS, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., et al. (1994) The New Production of Knowledge. Sage Publications, Inc., London.

HAIR Jr., J., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., Black, W. C., (2005). Análise Multivariada de Dados. Bookman, Porto Alegre

IPEN (2007). Relatório de Gestão, São Paulo.

JARVIS, C. B., Mackenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M. (2003). A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model mis specification in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, pp. 199-218.

MILES, M. B., Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: an expanded sourcebook. California Sage Publications, Inc.

OECD (2002). Manual Frascati. OECD publications service, Paris.

LANDES, D. S. (1998). The Wealth and Poverty of Nations: why some are so rich and some so poor. W. Norton & Company, New York.

PRICE, R. H., Behrens, T. (2003). Working Pasteur´s quadrant: harnessing science and action for community change. American Journal of Community Psychology, 31, pp. 219-223.

RAJASEKAR, S., Philominathan, P., Chinnathambi, V., (2006). Research methodology, Ar XIV Physics. http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0601009v2 [Retrieved from the Web 22 May 2008]

RINGLE, C. M., Wende, S., Will, A. (2005). SmartPLS 2.0 M3 (beta). University of Hamburg, Germany. http://www.smartpls.de [Retrieved from the Web 04 Sep 2009]

ROOT-BERNSTEIN, R. S., (1989). Who discovers and invents. Research Technology Management, 32, pp. 43-50.

RUSH, H., Bessant, J., Hobday, M. (2007). Assessing the technological capabilities of firms: developing a policy tool. R-D Management, 37, pp. 221-236.

SÁENZ, T. W. Capote, E. C. (2002). Ciência, Inovação e Gestão Tecnológica. CNI/IEL/SENAI ABIPTI, Brasília.

STOKES, D. E. (1997). Pasteur´s Quadrant: basic science and technological innovation. The Brookings Institution, Washington.

SIM, S. K., Duffy, A. H. B. (2004). Knowledge transformers: a link between learning and creativity, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 18, pp. 271-279.

SIMMONS, P. E., Brunkhorst, H., Lunetta, V., et al. (2005). Developing a research agenda in science education, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14, pp. 239-252.

TSAO, J. Y., Boyack, K. W., Coltrin, M. E., et al. (2008). Galileo´s stream: a framework for understanding knowledge production, Research Policy, 37, pp. 330-352.

TRUJILLO Ferrari, A. (1974) Metodologia da Ciência. 2 and 3rd. ed. Kennedy, Rio de Janeiro.

UN, C. A. (2007). Managing the innovators for exploration and exploitation. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 2, pp. 4-20.

ZWICKER, R., Souza, C. A., Bido, D. S. (2008). Uma revisão do modelo do grau de informatização de empresas: novas propostas de estimação e modelagem usando PLS ( partial least squares ), Proceedings of the XXXII Encontro da Associação dos Programas de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, ANPAD.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242009000400008

Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2009 Journal of Technology Management & Innovation

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2018 © Universidad Alberto Hurtado - Facultad de Economía y Negocios. 
Erasmo Escala 1835 - Santiago, Chile.
Economic Analysis Review | Observatorio Económico | Gestión y Tendencias 

Journal Supported by