The Usefulness of Patent Stage and Sectoral Pattern in Open Innovation Licensing

Jun Young Kim, Yongtae Park

Abstract


The relative importance to the particular industry of licensing has not been done enough empirically to pursue the route of the open innovation. That is why the industrial level research on open innovation is more complicated than that of company level. This paper tries to survey industrial level licensing by combining the technology regime theory with NTB(National Technology Bank) score model of KTTC(Korea Technology Transfer Center) and tries to transform Likert score into general value proxy by using information of valuator’s organizations. This paper also introduces two new factors named as ‘patent authorization stage’ for classifying patent status and ‘technology regime based industrial innovation pattern’ for adopting sectoral level research in order to overcome drawbacks of score model in case of application to open innovation licensing.

Keywords


score model; patent; innovation; sector; pattern

Full Text:

PDF [en]

References


ABERNATHY, W.J., Utterback, J.M., (1978) Patterns of Innovation in Technology. Technology Review, 80, 4047.

BALASUBRAMANYAM,V, (1973) International technology transfer to India. Praeger, New York

BOWER, G., Hilgard, E., (1980) Theories of learning. Fifth ed, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

BRESCHI, S., Malerba, R, Orsenigo, L, (2000) Technological regimes and Schumpeterian patterns of innovation. The Economic Journal, 110, 388-410.

BURATTI, N. and Penco, L, (2001) Assisted technology transfer to SMEs: lessons from an exemplary case. Technovation, 21, 35-43

CHESBROUGH, H., (2002) Making sense of corporate venture capital. Harvard Business Review, 80, 90-97.

CHESBROUGH, H., (2003) Open Innovation The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA.

CHESBROUGH, H., Rosenbloom, R., (2002) The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: evidence from Xerox corporation's technology spin-off companies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11, 529-555

CHESBROUGH, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., West, J., (2006) Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm. Oxford University Press, Oxford

CHRISTENSEN, CM. Bower, J.L, (1996) Customer Power, Strategic Investment, and the Failure of Leading Firms. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 197-218

COHEN, W.M., Levinthal, D.A., (1990) Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128-152.

DAGHFOUS, A., (2004) An empirical investigation of the roles of prior knowledge and learning activities in technology transfer. Technovation, 24, 939-953

DOSI, G., (1988) Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation.Journal of Economic Literature, 26, 1120-1171.

DUNNING, J. H., (1981) Alternative channels and modes of international resource transmission, in: Sagafi, (eds.) Controlling international technology transfer: Issues, Perspective and Policy Implications. Pergamon, New York

EISENHARDT, K., (1989) Agency theory:An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14, 57-74

ELIASSON, G., (1992) Business Competence, Organizational Learning and Economic Growth, in: F. Scherer and M. Perman (eds.), Entrepreneurship, Technological Innovation, and Economic Growth. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor

GARAVELLI, A.C, Gorgoglione, M., Scozzi, B., (2002) Managing knowledge transfer by knowledge technologies. Technovation, 22, 369-279

HAMERI, A.,( 1996) Technology transfer between basic research and industry, Technovation, 16, 51 -57

HENDERSON, R.M., Clark, K.B., (1990) Architectural innovation: the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly 35, 9-30.

HOBDAY, M.(1998) Product complexity, Innovation and Industrial Organization. Research Policy, 26,689-719

HOLMSTROM, B.,(1979) Moral Hazard and Observability, The Bell Journal of Economics, 10,74-91.

HUGES, T, (1982) Network of Power electrification in western society, 1800~1930, John Hopkins University Press.

HUR, K.I., Watanabe, C, (2002) Dynamic process of technology spillover; a transfer function approach, Technovation, 22, 437-444

KAMIEN M.I., Tauman.Y, (1986) Fees vs. Royalties and Private value of a Patent. The Quartely Journal of Economic, 101, 471-491.

KASSICIEH, K.S., Kirchhoff, A.B., Walsh, T.S., McWhorter, P.J., (2002) The role of small firms in the transfer of disruptive technologies, Technovation 22, 667-674

KITCH, E.W., (1977) The Nature and Function of the Patent System. Journal of Law and Economics, 20, 265-290.

KIRSCHBAUM, R., (2005) Open innovation in practice. Research-Technology Management, 48, 24-28.

LAZONIK, W, (1993) Learning and the dynamics of international competitive advantage. In: R.Thomson (eds.). Learning and technological change, St. Martin's Press, New York, pp. 172-197

LEE, J., Win, H.N., (2004) Technology transfer between university research centers and industry in Singapore. Technovation, 24, 433-442

MACHO-STADLER, I.X. Martnez-Giralt, J.D. Pérez-Castrillo, (1996) The role of Information in licensing contract design. Research Policy, 25, 43-57

MALERBA, F, Orsenigo, L, (1996)The dynamics and evolution of industries. Industrial and Corporate Change, 5, 51-87.

MALERBA, F, Orsenigo, L, (1997) Technological regimes and sectoral patterns of innovative activities. Industrial and Corporate Change, 6, 83-117.

MALERBA, F, Orsenigo, L, (1999) Technological entry, exit and survival, an empirical analysis of patent data, Research Policy, 28, 643-660

MARD, M., (2000a) Financial factors: cost approach to valuing intellectual property, Licensing journal, August, 27-28

MARD, M., (2000b) Financial factors: income approach to valuing intellectual property, Licensing journal, September, 27-30

MERGES, R., Nelson, R., (1990) On the Complex Economics of Patent Scope. Columbia Law Review, 90, 839-916.

METCALFE, S., (1990) On diffusion, investment and the process of technological change, in: Deiaco E, Hornell E,Vickery G, Technology and investment crucial issues for the 1990s, Pinter Publishers, London

NELSON, R., Phelps, E., (1966) Investment in Humans, Technological Diffusion, and Economic growth, American Economic Review, 61, 6975

NELSON, R.R., Winter, S.G., (1977) In search of useful theory of innovation, Research Policy, 6, 36-76

NICHOLLS-NIXON, C, (1993) Absorptive capacity and technological sourcing: Implications for the responsiveness of established firms. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Purdue University

NIOSI, J., Saviotti, R, Bellon, B., Crow, M.,(1993) National system of innovation: In search of a workable concept, system of innovation, Technology in Society, 15,207-227

NONAKA, I., (1994) A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation, Organizational Science, 5, 14-37

NONAKA, I.,Takeuchi, H., (1995) The knowledge creating company. Oxford University Press, New York

PAVITT, K., (1984) Pattern of Technical Change: Toward a Taxonomy and a Theory, Research Policy, 13, 343-273

PISANO, G., (1990) The R & D boundaries of the firm: An empirical analysis, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 153-176

POLANYI, M., (1966) The Tacit Dimensions, Doubleday Anchor, London

RADOSEVIC, S., (1999) International technology transfer policy: from "contract bargaining" to "sourcing". Technovation, 19, 433-444

ROGENBERG, N., (1976) Perspective on Technology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

SAHAL, D., (1981) Patterns of Technological Innovation, Addison-Wesley

SCHMOOKLER, J., (1966) Invention and Economic Growth. Harvard University Press.

TEECE, D., (1986) Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15, 285-305.

TIROLE, J., (1989) The theory of industrial organization. The MIT Press., Boston

TUSHMAN, M.L, Anderson, P., (1986) Technological discontinuities and organizational environment, Administrative Science Quarterly 31, 439-465

TUSHMAN, M.L. Rosenkopf, L, (1992) Organizational Determinants of Technological Change: Toward a Sociology of Technological Evolution. Research in Organizational Behavior, 14, 311




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242008000200004



Copyright (c)



2017 © Universidad Alberto Hurtado - Facultad de Economía y Negocios. 
Erasmo Escala 1835 - Santiago, Chile.
Economic Analysis Review | Observatorio Económico | Gestión y Tendencias 

Journal Supported by Chimera Innova Group