Innovation models and technological parks: interaction between parks and innovation agents

Hilka Vier Machado, Fábio Lazzarotti, Fernando Fantoni Bencke

Abstract


Technological parks are strategic innovation places for the stimulation of synergy among different agents. Current theoretical study identifies forms of interactions between technological parks and agents mentioned in interactive models of innovation. Foregrounded on triple, quadruple e quintuple helix models, current analysis investigates interactions of parks with companies, universities, government, civil society and the natural environment. One of the main contributions of current study is the integrating approach of interactions between parks and agents mentioned in innovation models. Overall interaction, provided in the results, favors the visualization of the parks´ management dynamics and the implementation of innovation models. Its practical contribution comprises subsidies for the construction of strategies, definition of stakeholders´ management and elaboration of good practices for technological parks.

Keywords


: technological parks; innovation; innovation models; innovation agents.

Full Text:

PDF

References


ANPROTEC. Associação Nacional de Entidades Promotoras de Empreendimentos e Tecnologias Avançadas. (2006). Panorama 2005. Retrieved from http://www.anprotec.org.br/pequisas/panorama2005.pdf . on 10/02/2006.

ANPROTEC. Associação Nacional de Entidades Promotoras de Empreendimentos e Tecnologias Avançadas. (2015). Parques & Incubadoras para o Desenvolvimento do Brasil. Benchmarking de Sistemas Internacionais de Inovação.

Audy, J. L. N. Ambiente da inovação brasileira. Revista Locus. Anprotec, ano 20, n. 77, set. 2014.

Autio, E. (2000). Growth of Technology-based new firms. In: Sexton, D. Landström, H. Handbook of Entrepreneurship. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

Bellavista, J., Sanz, L. (2009). Science and technology parks: habitats of innovation: introduction to special section. Science and Public Policy, 36, (7), pp. 499-510. https://doi.org/10.3152/030234209x465543

Belz, F.M., Binder, J.K. (2017). Sustainable Entrepreneurship: A Convergent Process Model. Business Strategy and the Environment. 26, p. 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1887

Bigliardi, B., Dormio, A.I., Nosella, A., Petroni, G. (2006). Assessing science parks’ performances: directions from selected Italian case studies. Technovation. 26, pp. 489-505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2005.01.002

Brasil. (2016). Presidência da República. Lei 13243 de 11 de janeiro de 2016. Retrieved from http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2016/lei/l13243.htm

Campanella, F., Peruta, M. R. D., Giudice, M. D. (2014). Creating conditions for innovative performance of science parks in Europe. How manage the intellectual capital for converting knowledge into organizational action. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 15, (4), pp. 576-596. https://doi.org/10.1108/jic-07-2014-0085

Carayannis, E. G; Campbell, D. F. (2009). Mode 3 and Quadruple Helix: toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46, (3), 4, pp. 201-234. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtm.2009.023374

Carayannis, E. G.; Barth, T. D.; Campbell, D. F. (2012).The Quintuple Helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1, (2), pp. 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/2192-5372-1-2

Carayannis, E. G.; Campbell, D. F. J. (2012). Mode 3 knowledge production in quadruple helix innovation systems. 21st-century democracy, innovation, and entrepreneurship for development Springer Briefs in business, v. 7, pp. 1-63. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2062-0_1

Carayannis, E. G., Rakhmatullin. (2014). The Quadruple/Quintuple Innovation Helixes and Smart Specialisation Strategies for Sustainable and Inclusive Growth in Europe and Beyond. Journal of Knowledge Economy, 5, pp.212–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-014-0185-8

Chan, K. F.; Lau, T. (2005). Assessing technology incubator programs in the science park: the good, the bad and the ugly. Technovation. 25, pp. 1215-1228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2004.03.010

Collarino, R. L. X., Torkomian, A. L. V. (2015). O papel dos Parques tecnológicos no estímulo à criação de spin-offs acadêmicas. Perspectivas em Gestão & Conhecimento,5, (2), pp. 210-225.

Conde, M. V. F.; Araújo-Jorge, T. C. (2003). Modelos e concepções de inovação: a transição de paradigmas, a reforma de C & T brasileira e as concepções de gestores de uma instituição pública de pesquisa em saúde. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 8, (3), pp. 727-741. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1413-81232003000300007

Dettwiler, P., Lindelöf, P., Löfsten, H. (2006). Utility of location: a comparative survey between small new technology-based firms located on and off Science Parks –Implications for facilities management. Technovation, 26, pp. 506-517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2005.05.008

Díez-Vial, I.; Montoro-Sánchez, A. (2016). How knowledge links with universities may foster innovation: the case of Science park. Technovation, 50-51, pp. 41-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2015.09.001

Díez-Vial, I.; Montoro-Sánchez, A. (2017). Research evolution in science parks and incubators:

foundations and new trends. Scientometrics, 110, pp.1243–1272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2218-5

Edquist, C. (2005). Systems of Innovation Perspectives and Challenges. In: Facerberg, J.; Mowery, D.C.; Nelson, R. R. The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Great Britain: Oxford University Press, pp. 181-207. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.003.0007

Etzkowitz, H.; Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The Dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 209, pp. 109-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0048-7333(99)00055-4

Felsenstein, D. (1994). University-related science parks —“seedbeds” or enclaves of innovation? Technovation, 14(2), pp. 93-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-4972(94)90105-8

Ferguson, R.; Olofsson, C. (2004). Science Parks and the Development of NTBFs- Location, Survival and Growth. Journal of Technology Transfer, 29, pp.5-17.

Giugliani, E.; Selig, P.M.; Santos, N. (2012). Modelo de governança para parques científicos e tecnológicos no Brasil. Brasília: Anprotec/SEBRAE.

Gouvea, R., Kassicieh, S., & Montoya, M. J. R. (2013). Using the quadruple helix to design strategies for the green economy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(2), pp. 221-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.05.003

Guan A. B.; Zhao Q. B. (2013). The impact of university– industry collaboration networks on innovation in nanobiopharmaceuticals. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 80(7), pp.1271-1286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.11.013

Hansson, F; Husted, K, Vestergaard, J. (2005). Second generation science parks: from structural holes jockeys to social capital catalysts of the knowledge society. Technovation. 25, (9), pp. 1039, 1049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2004.03.003

Hansson, F. (2007). Science parks as knowledge organizations – the “ba” in action? European Journal of Innovation Management, 10, (3), pp. 348-366. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060710776752

Hauser, G.; Daronco, E. L.; Souza, D. O. G.; Zen, A. (2015). Capacidade de inovação de Parques Tecnológicos em países emergentes: uma proposta metodológica. Congresso Latino Americano de gestão Tecnológica, ALTEC, Anais, 2015. Porto Alegre, RS.

Hommen, L., Doloreux, D., Larsson, E. (2006). Emergence and Growth of Mjärdevi Science Park in Linköping, Sweden. European Planning Studies, 14 (10), pp. 1331- 1361. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310600852555

Julien, P.A. (2010). Empreendedorismo e Economia do Conhecimento. São Paulo Saraiva.

Koh, F. C. C; Koh, W, T. H; Tschang, F, T. (2005). An analytical framework for science parks and technology districts with an application to Singapore. Journal of Business Venturing, 20, pp.217-239. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.626361

Lai, Hsien-Che; Shyu, Joseph, Z. (2005). A comparison of innovation capacity of science parks across the Taiwan Strait: the case of Zhang Jang Hig Tech Park and Hsinchu Science-based Industrial Park. Technovation, 25, pp. 805-813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2003.11.004

Lastres, H. M., & Cassiolato, J. E. (2003). Glossário de arranjos e sistemas produtivos e inovativos locais. Rio de Janeiro.

Lee, J.; Hung, Shih-Chang. (2003). On the transformation of Science Park – The Case of The Hsinchu Science-based Industrial Park. XX IASP World Conference on Science and Technology Parks. Lisboa.

Lima, M. C.; Cavalcante, L. R. M. Teixeira (2005). Parques Tecnológicos e Desenvolvimento regional em sistemas de inovação fragmentados. XI Seminário Latino Iberoamericano de Gestion Tecnológica. Salvador.

Lindelöf, P., Löfsten, H.. (2002). Growth, management and financing of new technology-based firms- assessing value-added contributions of firms located on and off Science Parks. Omega The International Journal of Management Science. 30, pp. 143-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0305-0483(02)00023-3

Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. (2006). US university research parks. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 25(1), 43-55.

Löfsten, H., Lindelöf, P. (2002). Science Parks and the growth of new technology-based firms-academic-industry links, innovation and markets. Research Policy, 31, pp. 859-876. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0048-7333(01)00153-6

Löfsten, H; Lindelöf, P. (2004). R&D networks and product innovation patterns-academic and non-academic new technology-based firms on Science Parks. Technovation, pp. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2004.02.007

Luengo, M.J.; Obeso, M. (2013). El efecto de la triple hélice en los resultados de innovación. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 53, (4) pp. 288-299. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0034-75902013000400006

McAdam, M.; Kristel, M.; McAdam, R. (2016). Situated regional university incubation: A multi-level stakeholder perspective. Technovation, 50-51, pp. 69–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2015.09.002

Mian, S;, Lamine, W., Fayoelle, A. (2016).Technology Business Incubation: An overview of the state of knowledge. Technovation, 50-51, pp. 1-12.

MCTI. Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação (2015). Estudos de práticas de parques tecnológicos e incubadoras de empresas. Brasília: 2015. Retrieved from http://www.anprotec.org.br/Relata/EstudoMelhoresPraticasParquesIncubadoras.pdf

Pacagnella Jr., A. C.; Porto, G. S.; Pacífico, O.; Salgado Jr., A.P.(2015). Project Stakeholder Management: A case study of a Brazilian Science Park. Journal of Technology, Management & Innovation, 10, 2, p. 39-49. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-27242015000200004

Pessôa, L. C., Cirani, C. B. S., Silva, M. M., & de Souza Rangel, A. (2012). Parques tecnológicos brasileiros: uma análise comparativa de modelos de gestão. RAI Revista de Administração e Inovação, 9(2), 253-273.

Quintas, P., Wield, D.; Massey, D. (1992). Academic-industry links and innovation: questioning the science park model. Technovation, 12(3), pp. 161-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-4972(92)90033-e

Ribeiro, J; Higuchi, A.; Bronzo, M; Veiga, R; Faria, A. (2016) A Framework for the Strategic Management of Science & Technology Parks. Journal of Technology, Management & Innovation. 11, 4, p. 80-90. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-27242016000400011

Salvador, E., Rolfo, S. (2011). Are incubators and science parks effective for research spin-offs? Evidence from Italy. Science and Public Policy, 38, (3), pp. 170-184. https://doi.org/10.3152/016502611x12849792159191

Schmidt, S.; Balestrin, A. (2015). Brazilian incubators and Science Park’s Results and R & D Collaboration. Journal of Technology, Management & Innovation, 10, 3, p. 32-43. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-27242015000300004

Schmidt, S.; Balestrin, A.; Engelman, R.; Bohnenberger, M. C. (2016). The influence of innovation environments in R & D results. Revista de Administração RAUSP 51, pp. 397-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rausp.2016.07.004

Schoonmaker, M. G., & Carayannis, E. G. (2013). Mode 3: a proposed classification scheme for the knowledge economy and society. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 4(4), pp. 556-577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-012-0097-4

Spolidoro, R.; Fischer, H., Baron, R. (2006).Science Parks designed as entities of the new paradigm: the Knowledge (global-based) Society. Proceedings XXII International of Science Parks – IASP World Conference, Helsinki, June 2006.

Vedovello, C. (2000). Aspectos Relevantes de Parques Tecnológicos e Incubadoras de Empresas. Revista do BNDES, Rio de Janeiro, 7,(14), pp.273-300.

Vedovello, C., Judice, V., Maculan, A. M. (2006). Revisão Crítica às Abordagens a Parques Tecnológicos: Alternativas Interpretativas às Experiências Brasileiras Recentes. RAI Revista de Administração e Inovação, 3, (2), pp. 103-118.

Velho, L. (2011). Conceitos de ciência e a política científica tecnológica e de inovação. Sociologias, Porto Alegre, 13, (26), pp. 128-153. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1517-45222011000100006

Villasalero, M. (2014). University knowledge, open innovation and technological capital in Spanish science parks – Research revealing or technology selling? Journal of Intellectual Capital 15,(4), pp. 479-496.

UNESCO (2016). Science Policy and Capacity-Building. Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/new/en/natural-sciences/science-technology/university-industry-partnerships/science-parks-around-the-world/2016.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242018000200104



Copyright (c) 2018 Journal of Technology Management & Innovation

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2018 © Universidad Alberto Hurtado - Facultad de Economía y Negocios. 
Erasmo Escala 1835 - Santiago, Chile.
Economic Analysis Review | Observatorio Económico | Gestión y Tendencias 

Journal Supported by